Diddy’s New Defense Amid Assault Lawsuit? Hey, That Wasn’t Illegal In 1991!


[Warning: Potentially Triggering Content]

Diddy pushed again towards one lady’s sexual assault lawsuit.

As we beforehand reported, the rapper is in some huge authorized bother. It all began when his former girlfriend Cassie filed and settled a lawsuit towards the rapper in November, accusing him of years of abuse, rape, and trafficking. Since then, an increasing number of individuals have come ahead with sexual harassment, abuse allegations, and extra towards Diddy. Even the Department of Homeland Security raided his properties in Los Angeles and Miami as a part of a intercourse trafficking investigation.

Related: Kesha Sends Diddy A Clear Message By Switching Up TiK ToK Lyrics During Coachella!

Throughout the scandal, the Bad Boy Records founder vehemently denied all the accusations. Now he needs to dismiss a few of the claims in one of many sexual assault instances. Which one? Here’s the deal…

Last yr, a girl named Joi Dickerson-Neal sued Diddy. The sufferer claimed she met Diddy whereas attending Syracuse University in 1991. After showing in considered one of his music movies, Joi went to dinner with him. Sadly, issues rapidly became a nightmare for her. She alleged Diddy “intentionally drugged” her on the restaurant, then took her residence, and sexually assaulted her.

And that’s not all. Joi additional accused the music mogul of committing an act of “revenge porn,” a time period that didn’t exist in the course of the ‘90s. She claimed he filmed the assault and shared the video with others. Diddy denied the allegations, saying the claims are “made up and not credible” as she filed the suit in the final hours of New York’s Adult Survivors Act:

“This last-minute lawsuit is an example of how a well-intentioned law can be turned on its head. Mr. Combs never assaulted her.”

Months later, Diddy’s tried out a brand new type of protection. According to new paperwork obtained by TMZ on Friday, the document producer argued he can’t be sued for a few of the claims. Why? Certain legal guidelines didn’t even exist on the time the alleged assault occurred, he identified within the submitting! What the f**okay??! Furthermore, Diddy says Joi can’t sue Bad Boy Records or Bad Boy Entertainment as she’s attempting to do since they didn’t exist on the time of the alleged assault both.

As for the legal guidelines in query? Joi sued Diddy beneath the New York Services for Victims of Human Trafficking Law. However, his attorneys famous within the docs that the regulation wasn’t in impact till 2007 – roughly 16 years after the alleged incident. Diddy additional challenged her claims beneath the New York State Revenge Porn Law, which wasn’t codified till 2019, the New York City Victims of Gender-Motivated Violence Protection Law, handed in 2000, and the 2016 NYC Revenge Porn Law.

The claims beneath these legal guidelines? The Making the Band alum needs them to be dismissed with prejudice! Ugh. However, his legal professionals insisted this wasn’t an act of contrition. They preserve Diddy didn’t commit the alleged acts towards Joi, together with sexual assault. It’s vital to notice his authorized workforce isn’t arguing towards the primary two counts – frequent regulation claims for assault and battery and intentional infliction of emotional misery — because the timing of sure statutes being handed doesn’t apply to these claims.

We’ll should see how this wild new tactic performs out. What are your reactions, Perezcious readers? Sound OFF within the feedback under!

If you or somebody you recognize has skilled sexual violence and want to study extra about assets, think about trying out https://www.rainn.org/resources

[Image via Chris Connor/WENN, MEGA/WENN]


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here