UPDATE: Charlie Adelson Testifies in Dan Markel Murder Case in Florida

0
460



Update printed 1:35 p.m. 11/3/2023: A Leon County prosecutor prodded Charlie Adelson on cross examination, trying to poke holes in his declare that Dan Markel’s homicide was a part of an elaborate extortion plot in opposition to him.

Assistant State Attorney Georgia Cappleman requested Adelson why his then-girlfriend Katherine Magbanua and hit man Sigfredo Garcia would undergo the difficulty of murdering one other particular person to extort him, after they may merely threaten Adelson and obtain the identical consequence.

“Why did whoever did it need to kill somebody to extort you?” Cappleman requested.

“You must ask them,” Adelson quipped.

“Why couldn’t they only put a gun to your head and say, ‘Give me no matter you could have in your protected?'” she requested.

Adelson is going through expenses of first-degree homicide and solicitation of homicide within the loss of life of Markel, his sister’s ex-husband. He is accused of enlisting Magbanua to rent Garcia to gun Markel down in his Tallahassee house throughout a heated child-custody battle between Markel and Adelson’s sister.

While prosecutors say Adelson gave Magbanua $3,000-a-month funds via his household’s dental workplace as a part of the murder-for-hire plot, Adelson claims the cash was meant to repay the extortion demand.

Cappleman recommended Adelson’s narrative that Garcia, who had a historical past with the Latin Kings gang, allowed him to pay the alleged extortion demand on a “cost plan” was far-fetched.

“Did she put you a cost plan?” Cappleman requested, to which Adelson replied, “Yes.”

The prosecutor additionally grilled Adelson about his relationship along with his ex-brother-in-law, Wendi, and his mother and father.

“Wasn’t this divorce an enormous deal in your loved ones?”

“It did not have an effect on my life,” he responded.

The pair exchanged verbal jabs at one another as Cappleman’s questions acquired extra pointed and accusatory. At instances, she resorted to creating dental puns whereas questioning the Broward County dentist.

The prosecutor ultimately turned her consideration to the items Magbanua obtained from Adelson following the homicide. Adelson maintained he was solely attempting to maintain her comfortable as a result of he was beneath the impression she was defending him from his extortionists.

“Are these items what it took to safe silence for therefore lengthy?” Cappleman requested.

The authentic story follows under.

Charlie Adelson, the Broward County dentist on trial for the July 2014 slaying of Florida State University legislation professor Dan Markel, took the stand Thursday — the primary time he has publicly aired his facet of the story since Markel’s loss of life in an alleged murder-for-hire plot.

“I’m actually nervous,” Adelson stated as his testimony started. “My complete life is dependent upon it.”

Adelson is accused of enlisting two hit males to kill Markel on the professor’s Tallahassee house within the midst of a child-custody dispute between Markel and Adelson’s sister, Wendi. The periodontist, who as soon as labored at his household’s distinguished medical follow in South Florida, faces expenses of first-degree homicide, conspiracy to commit homicide, and solicitation to commit homicide.

Under oath, Adelson sought to clarify feedback he made to his sister previous to Markel’s loss of life, wherein he famous that purchasing her a TV set for a divorce present could be cheaper than hiring a success man to kill Markel. Prosecutors have cited Adelson’s repeated quips about hiring an murderer as open-and-shut proof that he was behind the plot to kill Markel.

Adelson insisted the feedback have been a joke he’d repeat and recycle when his sister was having issues along with her ex.

“The stupidest factor I’ve ever stated in my life,” Adelson testified. “I stated it as an entire joke and it was silly. I try this lots.”

“Did you rent anybody to kill him?” protection lawyer Daniel Rashabum requested at one level.

“No,” Adelson replied.

Prosecutors declare Adelson orchestrated the homicide after Markel refused to maneuver along with his kids to South Florida with a purpose to be near the Adelson household. Adelson’s ex-girlfriend, Katherine Magbanua, testified early this week that Adelson approached her at a Halloween celebration a decade in the past and requested her, “Do you realize anyone that might hurt somebody?”

“Back in 2014, the Adelson household had an enormous downside,” Assistant State Attorney Sarah Dugan instructed the jury throughout opening statements. “That massive downside was Dan Markel and the answer to that downside was this defendant, as a result of he had a girlfriend [Magbanua] with connections to the kind of people who find themselves prepared and able to pointing a gun at a stranger and pulling the set off.”

On the stand, Adelson maintained that he beloved his nephews and would by no means need to take their father away from them. He stated the custody dispute did not incense him or trigger him to lose sleep, stating, “It did not change something in my life.”

The 47-year-old dentist testified that the homicide plot boiled right down to an extortion scheme by Magbanua and her ex-lover, Sigfredo Garcia, who was one of many hit males.

Adelson testified that Magbanua needed extra out of their relationship than he did and that Garcia hated him and needed him useless.

The Day of the Slaying

Adelson testified he spent the morning of Markel’s homicide working at two completely different dental workplaces within the seaside city of Jupiter. He stated he’d missed a number of texts from his mom and solely realized concerning the homicide when he lastly known as her.

“I used to be shocked,” he claimed. “I stated, ‘Is he going to be okay? Are the boys okay? Is Wendi okay? What occurred?'”

Adelson stated Magbanua got here to his house that evening and she or he “regarded panicked and upset.”

“She regarded extra upset than I ever seen her,” he testified.

That’s when she defined that it was all her fault, Adelson stated. He stated she admitted she’d “spoken an excessive amount of” concerning the Adelson household’s private issues and wealth, together with a $1 million supply the Adelsons made to Markel to entice him to maneuver to South Florida.

Adelson stated Magbanua instructed him “a good friend,” who had realized of the household’s sources, shot Markel and was demanding greater than $300,000. When he requested whether or not Garcia was the “good friend,” he stated, she would not reveal who it was.

“She stated, ‘If you do not pay in 48 hours, they’ll kill you,'” Adelson testified.

Adelson stated he instructed Magbanua he did not have that form of cash. She took all of the money out of Adelson’s protected — $138,000 — telling him she would see what her good friend will settle for and proposing that Adelson make month-to-month funds of $3,000 if he couldn’t instantly pay what the person needed, Adelson testified. He stated he did not suspect she was a part of the alleged extortion plot.

The following morning, when he realized Markel had died, Adelson selected to not inform the police for concern the extortionists would kill him, he testified. He stated he started carrying a firearm when he went out and sleeping with a gun in his nightstand, and that he put in safety cameras outdoors his home and workplace.

Adelson sat largely calm and composed throughout his testimony, trying within the path of his lawyer. Dressed in a navy-blue swimsuit, he appeared to change into emotional when talking concerning the homicide.

The dentist provided jurors a competing narrative that diverged from Magbanua’s testimony at almost each juncture.

Magbanua instructed the jury on Monday that within the early summer time of 2014, Adelson had change into “adamant about this job getting executed” to kill Markel.

“He painted this image that this was a horrible man and was making his household undergo lots custodywise along with his sister,” she testified, claiming that Adelson handed her a stack of money, bundled and stapled collectively, the day after the homicide.

Magbanua, Garcia, and the second hit man, Luis Rivera, are serving jail sentences for his or her roles in Markel’s homicide.

During her testimony this week, Magbanua stated she lied about her innocence within the hope she’d be acquitted when she testified at her 2019 trial and a 2022 retrial. She stated she’d refused to just accept a plea deal in trade for cooperating with prosecutors as a result of that may have required her to betray Garcia, the daddy of her kids.

“I consider the reality wanted to return out now so the household can get some kind of closure,” Magbanua testified this week.

The Aftermath

On the stand, Adelson testified that he broke up with Magbanua inside weeks after the homicide however met along with her in August 2014 to make a $3,000 cost to her “good friend.” He instructed the jury he’d begun to suspect she is perhaps concerned within the extortion, however she continued to disclaim it and apologized profusely for what occurred.

Adelson stated Magbanua requested future funds be made within the type of payroll checks from the household’s dental follow, Adelson Institute — an association that may make it attainable for her and her kids to be lined by medical health insurance via the workplace. He testified that he instructed his mom, Donna, who dealt with the workplace payroll, so as to add Magbanua and ship her checks.

The dentist stated his mom’s repeated questions concerning the odd monetary association led him to inform her concerning the ongoing extortion plot. Though Donna Adelson needed to go to the police, he stated he persuaded her to not, and to not inform his sister or father.

As for items he gave Magbanua within the months that adopted the homicide, Adelson testified that he felt he needed to hold her comfortable in trade for safeguarding him. He stated he stayed in contact with Magbanua as a result of she was “so broke on a regular basis” that he believed her when she instructed him she had no involvement within the extortion plot and was not sharing within the proceeds.

“Every time she was asking me for cash, I felt good. I believed she wasn’t a part of it,” he testified.



LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here