Harris Dickinson’s Feature Debut Is Earnest Yet Unsteady [Cannes]

Being unhoused is commonly related to the thought of roughness: tough sleeping, having it tough, going by a tough patch. Yet, Frank Dillane’s Mike embodies a contrasting magnificence. His delicate limbs tuck tightly in opposition to a slender body when night time comes, his contained physique quietly mendacity atop a makeshift mattress wrangled with flat cardboard bins and a skinny layer of cloth. This stunning, angular man is the central character in Harris Dickinson’s function debut “Urchin,” which takes its title from a largely retired time period assigned to principally unhoused, poor younger youngsters wearing soiled rags. 

READ MORE: Cannes 2025 Most Anticipated Films: ‘Sentimental Value,’ ‘Eddington,’ ‘Die My Love’

From Sherlock Holmes to Oliver Twist, urchins have lengthy populated British storytelling, and Dickinson’s contribution to the trope first finds Mike waking as much as the loud phrases of a avenue preacher, singing the praises of a God he is aware of to not be all that merciful. It is telling that it’s the girl who wakes Mike up, her voice proving extra disruptive than the revving motors and sharp horns zooming dangerously near his ears as he sleeps on a bustling sidewalk. But, as we’ll study, Mike is much less jolted by the shrieking, mechanical loudness of the bodily constructions surrounding him than he’s by quietly spoken phrases drenched in the kind of honesty that may defend him from the errors he’s so settled into making.  

This clear understanding of Mike, which is established from the very first scene, is the second best power of Dickinson’s first directorial outing. The first is Dillane, brilliantly solid in a task that requires exactly the model of unpolished charisma of the younger performer. While “Urchin” is rooted in empathy, its protagonist doesn’t at all times immediately advantage it; his conduct is as simply conducive to violence and blatant disregard as it’s to the sort of throwaway allure of the assured. 

To persuade the unbudging, Dillane barely curves the nook of his mouth, dropping his shoulders to the aspect in an indication of vulnerability. When one thing he desires isn’t his to take, this vitality rocks up as a volcano, culminating in a nasty, irrevocable violence that traumatizes earlier than it’s even consolidated. Dickinson steps in entrance of the digital camera to play certainly one of Mike’s avenue companions early on, his signature calculated containment proving a terrific counterbalance to Dillane’s outgoing aptitude, the 2 a bittersweet seesaw: when one is up, the opposite is certain to be down.

The first act of Dickinson’s drama zooms into this vitality, with Mike wandering the streets till two fateful minutes brutally take away his proper to roam. “Urchin” is at its strongest then, grappling with the unpredictability of desperation and the thorny greyness of morality whereas rigorously refusing to step on both aspect of the blurry line. Alas, the superbly shot interlude that separates these first moments from the act that may succeed additionally alerts a coming unsteadiness from which the movie by no means fairly manages to bounce again. 

Support unbiased film journalism to maintain it alive. Sign up for The Playlist Newsletter. All the content material you need and, oh, proper, it’s free.

Despite shedding a little bit of steam, “Urchin” hits a beautiful patch as soon as Mike takes a job as a sous-chef at a shaggy resort variety to misfits and hopefuls. The resort chapter brings with it a welcome handful of supporting solid that permits Dickinson to stretch his writing muscle tissues, from a fatherly chef and a compassionate bureaucrat to the pair of younger women who quickly deliver the brand new rent beneath their enthusiastic wing. But the time within the resort is unfortunately scarce, and what comes after struggles to succeed in the identical stage of refinement as the primary act or the earnestness of the second. 

Once Mike is again sliding down a spiral that feels unstoppable, “Urchin” loses its grip on the sense of place that so competently set his journey till then. Dickinson stitches the story with a handful of stylized interludes, typically lingering inside a grotto that hints on the sense of placidity and connection to spirituality that constitutes the marginally rushed, maybe too valuable ending scene. The iconography of this ending is daring but considerably off, unable to appease a sure frustration on the lack of probing dedicated to the broader questions of structural malaise which can be teased but left unearthed on the expense of a neater however much less attention-grabbing conclusion. Still, “Urchin” places ahead a delicate, promising director. And an much more promising author. [C+] 

Follow alongside for all our protection of the 2025 Cannes Film Festival, together with previews, critiques, interviews, and extra.