Director Dan Reed developed an obsession with what he calls “the mass consumption of lies” when he began researching Terror on the Mall, his documentary about the Westgate procuring heart assault of 2013. When Reed initially googled the mass slaying that killed at the very least 67 individuals, “the top results were that it was all a hoax, and the blood was fake, and all the people were actors.” At the time, it was extra uncommon than it’s as we speak to listen to distinguished voices denying the simple. Then, as now, one of many loudest such voices was conspiracy theorist, on-line persona, and vitamin salesman Alex Jones.
“I’ve watched more InfoWars than any human being should have to,” Reed says, referring to Jones’s public entry turned on-line discuss present, The Alex Jones Show (which many watch by way of Jones’s InfoWars web site). That’s not as a result of he’s a fan of Jones’s far-right, fringe-interest content material, however due to Jones’s vociferous denial of the 2012 Sandy Hook Elementary School assault, wherein 26 individuals had been fatally shot by a single man. The discuss present host lengthy insisted that the taking pictures, wherein 20 kids aged six and 7 years previous had been killed, was a lie. That declare varieties the inspiration of Reed’s new documentary, The Truth vs. Alex Jones, which debuts on HBO March 26.
At the time of the Newtown, Connecticut taking pictures, mass slayings had been far rarer within the US than they’re now. (According to the National Institute of Health, there have been 269 in 2013. There had been 656 in 2023.) But in response to Jones on the time, crimes just like the one at Sandy Hook had been a “false flag,” made-up occasions that may be used to strip patriotic Americans of their Second Amendment rights. On his present and his web site, Jones and his workers took particular purpose on the mother and father of the kids slain on the college, breaking down interviews and photographs with false explanations of the way it was supposedly faked. Jones’s monumental, passionate viewers turned in opposition to the grieving individuals, harassing them on-line and off.
Reed was no stranger to on-line falsehoods by the point a number of of those mother and father filed swimsuit in opposition to Jones, claiming that he had defamed them along with his claims that the taking pictures hadn’t occurred. The British filmmaker additionally directed and produced Leaving Neverland, the 2019 documentary that detailed the a number of allegations of kid sexual abuse in opposition to late pop star Michael Jackson: “I got trolled a lot by people denying that anything bad could have happened with the great King of Pop.” That expertise put in Reed’s head “the notion that lies are being told on this vast scale. And there’s a huge market for them.” (Reed declined to remark when requested about an upcoming dramatic movie adaptation of Jackson’s life, saying that the crucial remarks he’d made elsewhere had been all he’d prefer to say at current.)
Reed is emphatic that The Truth vs. Alex Jones isn’t a movie about Sandy Hook. But there isn’t any method to observe the litigation in opposition to Jones with out establishing, for these sitting within the again, that the taking pictures did certainly happen. Daniel Jewiss, a now retired Connecticut State Police detective who led the taking pictures investigation, spends six minutes of display screen time explaining precisely what occurred. “His name’s on the top of the report, and he knows it back to front,” Reed says.
“He did this incredible thing of going through each room and going through each step” of the assault, saying the identify of each sufferer within the bloodbath. That wasn’t one thing Reed requested him to do, and in reality, “it didn’t hit me with the force that it has in the film. But then once my editor put it together with the forensic pictures, it became this really sort of solemn and, I hope, restrained telling of the story.”
It’s remarkably painful to observe, particularly when paired with footage of the mother and father who spoke with Reed for the movie. Then we’re subjected to clip after clip of Jones mocking the mother and father and spreading misinformation earlier than he switches gears to urging viewers to buy his line of dietary supplements. It’s sufficient to make one marvel if Jones is mentally in poor health, or topic to highly effective delusions. At least, till we get to the a part of the documentary the place Jones seems in courtroom.
Though Jones didn’t take part within the precise defamation trials in opposition to him, he was discovered liable by default in instances in Connecticut and Texas. By then, Reed was knee-deep within the documentary, however couldn’t make sure that Jones would ever seem in courtroom. When it got here time to find out damages, although, Jones took the stand in each instances. “And all his fantasies fell apart in court, and he was exposed as a con man,” Reed says.
In Reed’s view, whereas there are many individuals who genuinely consider that the college taking pictures was faux, Jones isn’t amongst them. In deposition footage from the movie, we see members of the InfoWars crew admit that gross sales of Jones’s merchandise would spike when he’d make controversial or outlandish statements. The claims about Sandy Hook, the mother and father’ legal professionals argued, had been a lever to spur gross sales.