[ad_1]
Last 12 months, Scandoval was tried within the courtroom of public opinion.
Now, Vanderpump Rules star Rachel (previously Raquel) Leviss is taking the dishonest scandal to a courtroom of regulation.
In a brand new lawsuit filed Thursday in Los Angeles Superior Court, Leviss, 29, accused co-stars Tom Sandoval, 40, and Ariana Madix, 38, of revenge porn, eavesdropping, invasion of privateness and intentional infliction of emotional misery.
According to leisure publication US Weekly, which obtained and seen the authorized submitting, Leviss alleges that Sandoval recorded a intercourse tape of her with out her consent.
Leviss and Sandoval infamously had a bombshell affair that got here to mild throughout Season 10 of Vanderpump Rules, when Sandoval was in an almost decade-long relationship with Madix. The affair — which might go on to be often called “Scandoval” among the many present’s followers — grabbed worldwide headlines in March 2023 and introduced record-breaking viewership to the present. Much of the scandal revolved across the alleged existence of a sexual FaceTime name between Leviss and Sandoval, which Leviss mentioned Sandoval recorded with out her permission.
Leviss is searching for unspecified damages and destruction of the intercourse tape. She has requested a jury trial.
Sandoval and Madix have but to remark publicly on the lawsuit or the accusations.
In the lawsuit, Leviss says the huge public consideration surrounding the dishonest scandal noticed her “humiliated and villainized for public consumption.” She argues she “remains a shell of her former self, with her career prospects stunted and her reputation in tatters.”
Scandoval, in accordance with the authorized submitting, made Leviss “without exaggeration, one of the most hated women in America.”
Leviss informed the courtroom she checked herself right into a “mental health facility” for 3 months as public curiosity in Scandoval exploded.
While noting that she has apologized to Madix “repeatedly” for her “morally objectionable” actions, Leviss, by means of her attorneys, claimed there may be extra to the story than the general public is conscious of.
“Lost in the mix was that Leviss was a victim of the predatory and dishonest behavior of an older man, who recorded sexually explicit videos of her without her knowledge or consent, which were then distributed, disseminated, and discussed publicly by a scorned woman seeking vengeance, catalyzing the scandal,” the submitting learn.
Leviss mentioned she was “misled” by reps at Bravo, the community that airs Vanderpump Rules, into believing she couldn’t publicly remark in regards to the scenario.
“It is clear that Bravo deliberately sacrificed Leviss for the sake of its commercial interests from its refusal to allow her the opportunity to tell her side of the story and defend herself, which she repeatedly begged for permission to do,” the lawsuit reads.
Earlier in 2023, Leviss additionally hit a number of of her Vanderpump Rules co-stars with cease-and-desist letters insisting they cease talking in regards to the intimate video, because it constituted a violation of California’s “nonconsensual pornography” legal guidelines.
(One Vanderpump Rules forged member, Lala Kent, would go on to apparently earn sufficient cash to pay the downpayment on her home after calling out Leviss for the cease-and-desist on-line. Kent informed Leviss to ship the authorized discover to her lawyer, Darrell, then capitalized off the sale of merchandise studying, “Send it to Darrell!”)
Bravo, NBCUniversal and the Vanderpump Rules producers, together with Andy Cohen, should not named as defendants within the lawsuit. As of this writing, there was no public remark from any of those events, both.
Leviss has thus far not appeared in Season 11 of Vanderpump Rules, which is at present airing.
© 2024 Global News, a division of Corus Entertainment Inc.
[ad_2]