Ferrari’s Carlos Sainz Jr. ‘disappointed’ about FIA’s attraction resolution

0
893

[ad_1]

Following an attraction and request for a Right of Review from Ferrari concerning the five-second penalty handed right down to Carlos Sainz Jr. on the finish of the Australian Grand Prix, FIA introduced on Tuesday that they had been denying the attraction, and Sainz’s penalty will stand. As beforehand famous, the penalty dropped Sainz out of the factors, leaving Ferrari with nothing to indicate for his or her efforts in Melbourne after Charles Leclerc retired on the opening lap.

In an announcement launched on social media, Sainz famous that whereas the incident is up to now, he nonetheless believes that the penalty is “too disproportionate” and that he stays “disappointed” by the choice:

In their attraction, the workforce supplied telemetry knowledge from Sainz’s automobile, in addition to an announcement from the motive force and different post-race feedback from different drivers concerning the situations on the finish of the race. In their willpower, FIA maintained that not one of the data would have modified their preliminary willpower that Sainz was “wholly” chargeable for a collision with Fernando Alonso following a late-race standing begin.

That collision knocked Alonso nito the gravel, and set off a series of occasions that additionally noticed Alpine’s Pierre Gasly and Esteban Ocon collide and knock one another out of the race.

Following the choice Tuesday from FIA, Ferrari issued an announcement that the workforce is in touch with FIA, F1, and the opposite groups concerning how penalties are decided, the ”with the intention of additional enhancing the policing of our sport:”

As famous in Sainz’s assertion, he believes that is essential, declaring that “we need to be clearer for the sake of our sport.”

Many — myself included — believed that Ferrari and Sainz had a good case at having their attraction absolutely heard, given how the FIA dealt with the collision between Ocon and Gasly on the finish of the race. Race officers heard from each drivers and decided that the collision was a “first lap” racing incident.

Perhaps that’s the reason my days of working towards legislation got here to an in depth …

[ad_2]

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here