[ad_1]
View gallery
Meghan Markle received the defamation lawsuit her estranged sister Samantha Markle filed in opposition to her in 2021. A Florida choose dominated in Meghan’s favor and threw out the case on Thursday, March 31. The Duchess of Sussex was accused of spreading malicious lies about Samantha in an unauthorized biography and through Meghan and Prince Harry’s bombshell Oprah Winfrey interview.
Meghan’s estranged half-sister from father Thomas Markle’s first marriage claimed Meghan defamed her within the 2020 e book Finding Freedom: Harry and Meghan and the Making of a Modern Royal Family, written by Omid Scobie and Carolyn Durand, by “contributing false information to the book through her agent and press secretary,” in keeping with courtroom paperwork, per Insider.
Samantha additionally mentioned within the $75k lawsuit that Meghan lied about being an “only child” in her interview with Oprah. Meghan had instructed Oprah on the time that she didn’t know Samantha, having solely met her a handful of occasions. “I grew up as an only child,” Meghan mentioned. “Which everyone who grew up around me knows. I wished I had siblings. I would’ve loved to have had siblings.”
Samantha’s authorized rep, Jamie Sasson, broke down how the Oprah feedback have been allegedly defaming in an August 2022 interview. “When she went on Oprah and said ‘I grew up as an only child’ there’s only one way to look at that, that she was an only child,” he instructed Newsweek. “Which then as a result, made the general perception of the public believe that my client was a liar and was making up a story claiming that she was Meghan Markle’s sister when, indeed, she truly was and this is what this comes down to.”
In a deferred judgement, Judge Charlene Edwards Honeywell granted Meghan her movement to dismiss the lawsuit, arguing Meghan was not answerable for the contents of Finding Freedom and that she gave her “opinion” in the course of the Oprah interview. “As a reasonable listener would understand it, defendant merely expresses an opinion about her childhood and her relationship with her half-siblings,” the choose wrote, per BBC. “Thus, the court finds that defendant’s statement is not objectively verifiable or subject to empirical proof…. plaintiff cannot plausibly disprove defendant’s opinion of her own childhood.”
[ad_2]