Elizabeth Hurley is denying an obvious rumor that she took Prince Harry‘s virginity method again when — one thing that is imagined to be alluded to in his forthcoming e-book.
The actress addressed what The Times claims is a juicy piece of gossip floating round within the U.Ok. — specifically, that Harry shagged Hurley as a young person … marking his first time. In an interview with the outlet, EH flatly debunks any notion of this being true.
She’s the poster lady of excessive camp, however Liz Hurley has additionally handled grief, shedding her ex-boyfriend, the cricketer Shane Warne, and her son’s father.
The actress talks about her newest movie – and being a mom 👇 https://t.co/NNTLYAZZYa
— The Times and The Sunday Times (@thetimes) December 16, 2022
@thetimes
She’s quoted as saying, ““Not me. Not guilty. Ha!” The writer writes, “Something about that ‘ha!’ provides me pause,” seemingly following up on it together with her … and Hurley responds with, “No. Not me. Absolutely not.”
The Times notes that Hurley used to have a farmhouse in Gloucestershire — northwest of London, and a bit south of Birmingham — and that, in earlier interviews, she’d made point out of how a lot enjoyable it was to bang on a rug by the hearth of her house.
They join that with yet one more rumor … that Harry’s set to disclose he first had intercourse with a gorgeous older girl within the “countryside” as a teen — one thing he’ll supposedly reveal in “Spare” — however apparently would not identify names, or disclose different deets that’d pin this down.
As for the way that ties to Liz, The Times merely states — “There’s a rumor it was Hurley,” however it’s unclear the place the hell they’re even getting that. In any case, it is within the rumor mill now.
We did some math and it sorta helps paint a clearer image of when this alleged hookup may’ve probably occurred. Harry would’ve been a “teen” between 1997 and 2003 (13 and 19, respectively) and that overlaps up with when Hurley owned this crib … 2002 to 2015.
If there’s any reality to this in any respect — which, once more, Hurley says there is not — then H (as Meg likes to name him) would’ve seemingly been 18 or so. Hypothetically … not unhealthy, huge man!