I’ve by no means thought of myself to be a gearhead. I take advantage of gear to hike, not the opposite manner round. That stated, in case you spend sufficient time backpacking over sufficient years, likelihood is you’ll accumulate the kind of tools essential to assist hold you protected and cozy(ish) in a variety of wilderness eventualities.
Pictured above are the backpacks I’ve used over the previous decade for just about all my mountaineering excursions. From day journeys to multi-month journeys, they’ve served me effectively in a broad number of environments and situations. I can’t say that anyone of them is the “very best.” Frankly, there isn’t a such factor. But I can say with a level of certainty that they’re all within the dialog for one of the best of their class. With solely a bit extra ado, right here’s a rundown of my backpack quiver as of 2023:
(Note: Please excuse the article’s wanky third-person title. I used to be attempting to think about one thing distinctive and semi-catchy that described what you’re about to learn. I thought of “My Favourite Backpacks” and “Backpacks for All Seasons,” however they each sounded too generic and yawn-inducing. Ultimately I accepted falling in need of my titular goal and went with wanky).
Day Hikes
Montbell Cross Runner Pack 15 – (Japan Online Store) / (US Online Store)
If you occur to identify me roaming the ridges, peaks, and valleys of Mexico’s Sierra Madre, likelihood is I’ll be sporting the Montbell Cross Runner Pack 15. Indeed, I prefer it a lot, it additionally serves for strolling round city and as a carry-on bag when flying. The Montbell Cross Runner 15 ideas the scales at 10.9 oz (308 gr) and includes a torso-hugging shoulder harness, double sternum straps, expandable/simply accessible shoulder pockets (sufficiently big for a water bottle or smartphone), and a secret squirrel inside pocket for a pockets and keys. The pack is hydration suitable, has a drawcord for compressing/stabilizing your load, and a 3D mesh backpanel to assist hold issues ethereal when temps begin to rise (Note: The Cross Runner additionally is available in a 7L model).
Montbell Cross Runner 15 in Mexico’s Sierra Madre.
I often fill the shoulder pockets with a smartphone, sunscreen, lip balm, hand sanitizer, and possibly a snack or two.
Gazing out from the sting of Cape Enniberg (754 m/2,474 ft), the world’s highest promontory (Faroe Islands, 2022).
Multi-day Trips (whole pack weight often under 24 lbs/11 kg)
Mountain Laurel Designs Burn 38 L (frameless)
Since 2009/10, I’ve used three totally different incarnations of the MLD Burn for a complete distance north of 20,000 mi/32,187 km (together with the Calendar Triple Crown/12 Long Walks in 2011/12). Over the years, the materials have modified, the amount and weight have elevated, and the straps are wider and extra cushioned, however it nonetheless sports activities the identical slim profile and cozy match that I’ve all the time loved. Here’s a assessment I wrote of the pack from 2016 (Note: Over the previous twenty years, MLD has established a well-earned repute for producing persistently high-quality ultralight gear. That stated, sometimes (possibly greater than sometimes), you’ll hear some of us moan and groan concerning the firm’s lead occasions. For my whimsical tackle this and lots of different quirks of the ultralight backpacking group, see 50 Signs You May Have Taken Ultralight Backpacking Too Far).
One of the most important hundreds I’ve carried within the Burn was throughout an roughly 240-mile (386 km) stretch between East Glacier and Helena, MT, on the Continental Divide Trail in August 2012 (Note: The Benchmark Ranch was closed due to fires on the time).
With a Dyneema model of the Burn on Norway’s Long Crossing of the Lofoten Islands (2018) (Note: As of 2023, the Burn now is available in both Ecopak UltraWeave or UltraGrid 200d RipStop).
Gossamer Gear Kumo 36 (frameless)
I used to be given this pack by Grant from Gossamer Gear at ALDHA West in 2014. My reminiscence’s a bit hazy, however I feel we could have been having a multi-beer dialog about Willie Nelson and the Austin music scene. Since these nebulous beginnings, I’ve taken the Kumo on the Colorado Trail (2015) and lots of brief journeys within the Sierra Madre. Indeed, to today, I carry it each Wednesday to haul my fruit and veggies from the native farmer’s market. After eight years of standard utilization, it nonetheless seems in nice form. If I used to be to pinpoint my favourite options of the Kumo (and Gossamer packs on the whole), the primary issues that come to thoughts are the vast shoulder straps, lid system, and general consolation and sturdiness. Retailing for US$170, the Kumo nonetheless charges as probably the greatest value-for-money ultralight packs in the marketplace.
Rocking the Kumo on the Colorado Trail (2015).
Multi-week Trips (whole pack weight repeatedly exceeds 24 lbs/11 kg)
Six Moon Designs Swift X (inside body)
Since March 2020, I’ve logged over 2,000 miles (3,219 km) with the Swift X within the Sierra Madre, Northern Alaska, Greenland, and Lapland. During this era, it’s grow to be my pack of alternative for long-haul journeys during which I’m repeatedly carrying heavy hundreds between 22 and 44 lbs (10-20 kg). I wrote a detailed assessment of the pack a few weeks in the past.
The standout function of the Swift X is the vest harness. Prior to utilizing this pack, I hadn’t tried a running-style vest harness on something apart from a daypack. However, over the previous few years, I’ve grow to be a giant fan of the torso-hugging match and weight distribution it helps present when negotiating difficult situations (e.g., river fords, snowfields, tussocks, blowdowns, or scree slopes) whereas carrying a heavy load.
Yours really on the Greenland Ice Cap – a not-to-be-missed supplemental part of the Arctic Circle Trail (September 2022) (Note: The Arctic Circle Trail and the Jotunheimen Loop pictured under are each featured in my upcoming e-book, Wanderlust Nordics, with Gestalten publications).
Crossing the Skautflye plateau throughout a loop hike round Norway’s Jotunheimen National Park (September 2022).
Hyperlite Mountain Gear 2400 Southwest (inside body)
If I take into consideration the HMG 2400 Southwest, the primary phrase that involves thoughts is “bombproof.” In 2016/17, I took this pack on a sequence of heavy-carry traverses, together with the Colorado part of the Sangre de Cristo Range (beginning weight 34 lb/15.4 kg), South Dakota’s Badlands (beginning weight 44 lb/20 kg), Bolivia’s Altiplano (max weight 33 lb/11 kg), and the hardest of all of them, a journey throughout Southwest Tasmania (beginning weight 42 lb/19 kg). The 2400 Southwest held up very effectively all through these difficult hikes, and although I haven’t used it a lot lately, it nonetheless seems in fine condition seven years after I first picked it up.
Besides its sturdiness, the standout function of the 2400 Southwest is its glorious weight switch functionality from shoulders to hips. Despite this, it appears bizarre that HMG has by no means added load lifters; there’s no query that they make a distinction when your pack weight is repeatedly north of twenty-two lb/10 kg. Indeed, the dearth of lifters, together with the vest harness and a bit extra inside quantity, had been the explanations I switched from the 2400 Southwest to the Swift X for my large-haul journeys since 2020.
Trekking throughout the Salar de Uyuni in the course of the Altiplano Traverse (Bolivia 2017).
The HMG Southwest 2400 throughout a 16 day meals keep on the Southwest Tasmania Traverse (2016).
Comparable Backpacks (Day, Frameless, Internal Frame)
The fashions listed under are all well-regarded amongst skilled ramblers and are in the identical ballpark as my very own packs in regard to quantity, high quality of supplies, and workmanship. A handful are made by giant firms akin to REI and Osprey, however most are produced by smaller, cottage industry-type producers. They aren’t listed in any explicit order apart from alphabetically:
5 Comparable Daypacks
5 Comparable Frameless Packs (35-40L)
5 Comparable Internal Framed Packs (50-55L)
The Old and the New(ish)…………….Macpac Torre (85 L) and MLD Burn (38 L). I carried the load-hauling monster on the best for a quick interval within the mid/late Nineties. My again and knees harm simply interested by it.
Related Articles
Disclaimer: All of the 5 backpacks featured above had been freebies. They got to me by ultralight/light-weight backpacking gear firms that I’ve partnered with at one time or one other for the reason that 2000s. I used to be below no obligation to write down a assessment for any of the packs, and the opinions expressed are my very own.
Disclosure: This put up comprises some affiliate hyperlinks, which implies The Hiking Life receives a small fee if you are going to buy an merchandise after clicking on one of many hyperlinks. This comes at no extra price to the reader and helps to help the web site in its persevering with purpose to create high quality content material for backpackers and hikers.