The shock Best Actress Oscar nomination for Andrea Riseborough’s efficiency within the drama “To Leslie” remains to be inflicting some angst in Hollywood, given the mission had little-to-no cash and no conventional Oscar marketing campaign behind it, stunning the business within the course of. Instead, a last-minute grassroots marketing campaign to get the actress a nomination was fueled by friends like Gwyneth Paltrow, Kate Winslet, Jennifer Aniston, Charlize Theron, Sarah Paulson, Edward Norton, and others. It ended up working, in the end, however the shock nomination was so controversial— god forbid, an underdog with no cash snag a coveted nomination—and has led to a marketing campaign evaluation/investigation by The Academy into how Riseborough precisely overtook extra high-profile potential contenders like Viola Davis for “The Woman King” (a perceived snub in the direction of extra acquainted candidates). As the Academy does its evaluation, doubtlessly rescinding the nomination, the controversy isn’t making some individuals pleased. One of these prepared to face up for Riseborough, together with her “To Leslie” co-star Marc Maron.
READ MORE: Andrea Riseborough Oscars Controversy Prompts Academy Campaign Review
The comedic actor, who it needs to be famous isn’t a member of the Academy of Motion Picture Sciences, is now publicly defending the actress from the backlash to the nomination whereas talking on his podcast “WTF With Marc Maron” by way of EW.
“Apparently, the Academy of Motion Picture Sciences, or whatever the f— it is, has decided to investigate Andrea Riseborough’s grassroots campaign to get her the Oscar nomination,” Maron mentioned. “Because I guess it so threatens their system that they’re completely bought out by corporate interests in the form of studios,” Maron mentioned on his well-liked podcast.
He continued to rail towards the cash/politics concerned with awards campaigns, “Millions of dollars [are] put into months of advertising campaigns, publicity, screenings by large corporate entertainment entities, and Andrea was championed by her peers through a grassroots campaign, which was pushed through by a few actors. The Academy is [like], ‘Well, we gotta take a look at this. This is not the way it’s supposed to work. Independent artists don’t deserve the attention of the Academy unless we see how it works exactly. So, we’re going to look into this.’”
Maron wasn’t the one one to voice their issues. “Yellowjackets” actress Christina Ricci in a now-deleted Instagram submit (noticed by The Independent), known as the investigation “elitist” and can “taint” the nomination regardless if nothing is uncovered within the evaluation.
“Seems hilarious that the ‘surprise nomination’ (meaning tons of money wasn’t spent to position this actress) of a legitimately brilliant performance is being met with an investigation,” Ricci wrote in a deleted Instagram submit. “So it’s only the films and actors that can afford the campaigns that deserve recognition? Feels elitist and exclusive and frankly very backward to me.” Then added, “If it’s taken away, shame on them.”
We’ll have to attend to see what this controversial “investigation” turns into and in the event that they’ll be daring sufficient to take the nomination away from Riseborough. That would most likely create nice upheaval, and it received’t occur, however Maron actually has a degree. While it’s a large disappointment that actresses like Viola Davis and Danielle Deadwyler (the star of “Till,” additionally an assumed frontrunner) have been neglected, punishing Riseborough for being a part of an natural, grassroots marketing campaign with no cash—which she herself didn’t begin, it was lead by the “To Leslie” director, Michael Morris —appears, a minimum of on its face, extraordinarily odd.
Presumably, issues will run as is when the Oscars happen on March 12, however the entire state of affairs positively has riled up the business in each the professional and con instructions.
Regardless, you possibly can hearken to that aforementioned episode of “WTF With Marc Maron” and listen to what he has to say beneath.