[ad_1]
\n<\/p>\n
Bam Margera<\/strong> simply dropped some main filth about his marriage to Nicole Boyd<\/strong>! The query is\u2026 is it even actual?<\/span><\/p>\n In courtroom paperwork acquired by People<\/em> Tuesday, the Jackass<\/em> alum claimed he was truly \u201cnever legally\u201d married to Nikki! WHAT?! We\u2019re speaking concerning the mom of his little one, Phoenix Wolf Margera<\/strong>, whom the 2 are presently within the midst of a custody battle over. And now he\u2019s saying they have been by no means\u00a0actually<\/em> married anyway??<\/span><\/p>\n Related: Kevin Costner \u2018Stunned\u2019 As Wife Of 25 Years Files For Divorce<\/strong><\/a><\/p>\n Bam is making an attempt to dismiss Nikki\u2019s February request for authorized separation, noting within the authorized docs:<\/p>\n \u201cBoyd and I have never been married, legally or otherwise. To my knowledge, Boyd has never legally changed her name in any state to \u2018Nicole Margera.\u2019 Every driver\u2019s license or other form of identification I have seen Boyd possess bears the name \u2018Nicole Boyd.\u2019\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n As you possible know, Nicole filed for authorized separation within the state of California again in February, asking for spousal help and for her authorized charges to be lined, which Bam is now claiming was \u201cin part, for the purpose of filing these actions in California to take advantage of the putative marriage laws that exist in California but not Pennsylvania.\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n He claimed in his courtroom docs that the 2 all the time resided in Pennsylvania, however that Boyd would typically journey to California throughout \u201cturbulent\u201d occasions of their relationship:\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n \u201cBoyd and I both resided in Pennsylvania from about 2010 to 2021. During these eleven (11) years, Boyd and I would occasionally travel outside of the state of Pennsylvania for business or vacation, however, we always maintained our domicile in Pennsylvania. My relationship with Boyd has been turbulent and unstable from the beginning and we have taken breaks from the relationship on numerous occasions. During these breaks Boyd would leave my home and go stay with her family in California. However, Boyd would always come back to Pennsylvania soon thereafter and we would resume our dating relationship.\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n He added that after they break up, and he or she moved to California full-time, solely then did she file her request \u201cunder a false name\u201d of Nicole Margera. <\/span>He did, nonetheless, acknowledge the 2 took half in a marriage in Reykjavik, Iceland in 2013 \u2014 however says it was a \u201cfaux [wedding] ceremony.\u201d It\u2019s unclear in the event that they ever acquired a US wedding ceremony license. He wrote within the filings:\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n \u201cI fully knew and understood that Boyd and I were not married. Boyd told me that she also knew and understood that we were not married.\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n Whoa. Is this true??<\/p>\n Related: Bam\u2019s Brother Says Star \u2018Is Dying\u2019<\/strong><\/a><\/p>\n Not in keeping with Nikki! Her legal professional, David Glass<\/strong>, informed Page Six<\/em> Tuesday:<\/span><\/p>\n \u201cAs an initial matter, it was not until just recently that Nikki had ever heard Bam\u2019s claim that they were never married. She was told that the wedding would occur in Iceland and that it was all taken care of.\u00a0 She had a wedding ceremony, and then returned to the U.S. and lived like a married couple with Bam for years.\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n They actually have been collectively such a very long time \u2014 and sure, residing as husband and spouse\u2026<\/p>\n The authorized consultant added that Nikki believed \u201cin good faith\u201d they have been certainly married, and may subsequently be thought-about a \u201cputative spouse,\u201d the place underneath California regulation, would entitle her to a \u201cdivision of property and spousal support, in addition to child custody and support\u201d whether or not they have been wed in a authorized ceremony or not.<\/span><\/p>\n Such a all of the sudden difficult case! Oof!<\/p>\n Elsewhere, Bam added that Boyd\u2019s \u201cnumerous false statements\u201d throughout January and February of this 12 months have been \u201churtful and untrue.\u201d He defined:<\/span><\/p>\n \u201cBoyd\u2019s statements alleged that I had not helped financially support my son and had refused to provide any future help. These statements were deeply hurtful and untrue as I have made multiple attempts to ensure that my son has been financially supported.\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n Legally we clearly do not know who\u2019s proper. But clearly Bam has been on a downward spiral slapping away everybody attempting to offer him a serving to hand \u2014 together with his household. We\u2019ll simply should see what the courts say, we guess.<\/span><\/p>\n What are YOUR ideas, Perezcious readers? Let us know within the feedback down beneath.<\/span><\/p>\n [Images via Nicole Boyd\/Instagram<\/a>]<\/em><\/p>\n<\/div>\n\n
\n
\n
\n
\n