[ad_1]
\n<\/p>\n
Was Raquel Leviss<\/strong>\u2018 authorized drama with Scheana Shay<\/strong> only a PR stunt?<\/p>\n By now you recognize the 28-year-old actuality star beforehand obtained a brief restraining order in opposition to her co-star, claiming the mother of 1 punched her when she came upon about her affair with Tom Sandoval<\/strong>. The 37-year-old denied attacking Raquel<\/a>, claiming the \u201csupposed dark markings around [Leviss\u2019] left eye have been there for months.\u201d She even went as far as to accuse her of \u201csabotaging\u201d the Season 10 reunion for the reason that two weren\u2019t allowed to work together or be inside 100 yards of one another on the time. And sure, Raquel did<\/em> find yourself dropping it the day after the reunion was filmed \u2014 regardless that their court docket listening to wasn\u2019t scheduled till a number of days in a while March 29. Or did she??<\/p>\n Related: Ariana Refuses To Film With Sandoval \u2014 What Does This Mean For VPR<\/em>?!<\/strong><\/a><\/p>\n You might recall, Raquel doubled down on Wednesday that the bodily altercation occurred, leading to a \u201cpermanent scar\u201d on her left eyebrow<\/a>. Either means, this authorized matter clearly made issues sophisticated when it got here to the reunion, forcing manufacturing to get artistic and make the castmates change locations all through filming on Thursday.<\/p>\n But in a stunning twist, Raquel introduced her determination to drop her request for a everlasting restraining order<\/a> on Friday \u2014 and claimed it was all Scheana\u2019s fault they weren’t capable of movie the reunion collectively:<\/p>\n \u201cMy team tried to work with Scheana on a mutually beneficial agreement hoping to get the TRO dropped earlier so we could film [the reunion episode] together. The TRO was intended to provide a cooling-off period after I was punched but I didn\u2019t want to continue with the permanent RO nor did I want to cause Scheana further agony and stress.\u201d<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n Seriously???<\/p>\n The day after the reunion, now you don\u2019t have a everlasting scar anymore?? The timing of this newest replace of their authorized drama is slightly sus, should you ask us. And we\u2019re not the one ones who assume so. A supply advised Page Six<\/em> on Friday that Raquel supposedly dropping her requisition for a everlasting restraining order is \u201cjust another PR stunt,\u201d including:<\/p>\n \u201cThere is no mechanism to terminate a civil temporary restraining order (TRO) early, unlike a domestic violence temporary restraining order.\u201d<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n So her announcement doesn\u2019t imply something? Wild!<\/p>\n The insider additional accused Raquel of making an attempt to keep away from getting \u201cin front of a judge,\u201d saying:<\/p>\n \u201cRaquel made false claims in order to obtain the TRO against Scheana and is aware that having to account for those in front of a judge are not in her best interest.\u201d<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n
\n
\n