The lady, then 27, was one of the best pal of Masterson\u2019s assistant and a part of the identical social circle of Church of Scientology members.<\/p>\n
She testified that she had solely meant to go to Masterson\u2019s home to select up a set of keys, and that her relationship had been uneasy with Masterson because the two had intercourse a number of months earlier, an incident she advised police was consensual in 2004 however later determined she hadn\u2019t consented to. She went again to police in 2016.<\/p>\n
\n
Story continues under commercial<\/p>\n<\/p><\/div>\n
In his cross-examination, Cohen requested whether or not it was her place in 2004 that Masterson had raped her the primary time that they had intercourse, and she or he answered \u201cno.\u201d Asked whether or not that was her place now, she additionally answered \u201cno.\u201d Court adjourned earlier than he might press her additional.<\/p>\n
All three of Masterson\u2019s accusers have been members of the Church of Scientology on the time they are saying they have been raped however have since left. Masterson stays a member. Judge Charlaine Olmedo stated earlier than the trial that she wouldn’t permit Scientology to develop into a de facto defendant however would permit restricted dialogue of it.<\/p>\n
Before the girl took the stand Wednesday after starting her testimony Tuesday, the decide warned her to not stray too far into discussions of the faith, a difficulty she had already admonished Deputy District Attorney Reinhold Mueller about.<\/p>\n
Scientology nonetheless got here up. The lady testified that a few of her mutual buddies filed so-called \u201cknowledge reports\u201d signaling their unhappiness along with her after she advised them in regards to the preliminary incident with Masterson, and she or he was summoned by an ethics officer who compelled her to make peace with him and take accountability.<\/p>\n
\u201cYou can never be a victim,\u201d the girl stated. \u201cNo matter what happens, you\u2019re always responsible.\u201d<\/p>\n
Asked if she nonetheless feared retaliation from anybody for coming ahead about Masterson, she replied \u201cabout half this courtroom.\u201d<\/p>\n
\n
Story continues under commercial<\/p>\n<\/p><\/div>\n
She testified that she signed a non-disclosure settlement with Masterson in 2004, and accepted $400,000 over the course of a 12 months, as a result of the church was going to tar her as a \u201csuppressive person\u201d in any other case. She stated she had violated the settlement \u201cabout 50 times\u201d since signing it.<\/p>\n
She testified that she had solely anticipated to be at Masterson\u2019s home, a social hub for his or her pal circle, for a couple of minutes.<\/p>\n
![](\"https:\/\/d21y75miwcfqoq.cloudfront.net\/70c8fc80\")
\n![\"\"\/](\"https:\/\/globalnews.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/10\/GettyImages-1243777275.jpg?quality=85&strip=all&w=336&h=224&crop=1\")
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n![\"Click](\"https:\/\/i2.wp.com\/media.globalnews.ca\/videostatic\/news\/96b1loiz3l-aa901vc3r2\/Danny_Masterson_to_face_trial-60a810d57503d44654242051_1_May_21_2021_20_37_23_poster.jpg?w=1040&quality=70&strip=all\")